Language：Japanese  

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Fukushima National College of Technology  

Why the League of Nations failed ? From the point of view, this paper examines the critic of League of Nations by German theorist Carl Schmitt and the meaning of the Monroe doctrine. As a result of this study, I conclude that the concept of International order based on universal justice inevitably brings a form of imperial rule.

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

CiNii Books

researchmap

researchmap

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Fukushima National College of Technology  

Kant criticized so-called labour theory of property, which was advocated by John Locke's "Two Treatises of Government". However Kant's criticism to labour theory was only pointed to the aspect of acquisition of land (ground). This paper gives two reasons for this background. Firstly, Kant divided the object of property into two groups; external thing and internal thing. According to this division, land is purely external thing.So we cannot explain the acquisition of land by labour theory, which starts from the view of internal mine (my body and labour). Secondly, according to Kant, land is regarded as "substance" of things, and other things as "inherence". It means that land is not only the object of private property but also the ground of a public legal system. Dealing with only private property, labour theory of property cannot be applied to original acquisition of land. To the contrary, Kant proposed the basic theory of property as intelligible possession. Though it contains some unclear points, it enables to explain two important faces of land property; private property and public dominion.

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Fukushima National College of Technology  

From modern dualistic law thinking, all human behaviors should be divided into two categories, legality and illegality. However, there is another legal domain between legality and illegality, or there are phenomena, which are clearly illegal but left as permissible behaviors. This paper considers this special domain of law world.

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：THE JAPAN ASSOCIATION OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY  

Following Rousseau's theory of people's sovereignty and his concept of law, Immanuel Kant described his ideal state as &ldquo;Gemeinwesen&rdquo;. He consciously and intentionally denied world republic in his book &ldquo;Zum ewigen Frieden&rdquo;. According to Rousseau, the virtue can become fruitful only within the context of &ldquo;l'amour de la patrie&rdquo; (patriotism). Rousseau's patriotism and republic theory is to be expected in a small city state, not in a large state. As such, anti-world republic dogma by Kant reflects the significance of patriotism in small state posited by Rousseau. Unlike Rousseau, however, Kant interpreted &ldquo;patriotism&rdquo; as directed at &ldquo;Land&rdquo;, and &ldquo;Volk&rdquo; as being a group with single ethnic identity, not as an universal &ldquo;Volk&rdquo;. Such distinctive characteristic of Kant's state theory has generally been assumed to have derived from his pre-modern character and historic circumstances.<br> In this paper, I suppose that the source of difference in the concepts held by the two distinct philosophers can be found in the difference of the size of states they presupposed. Rousseau considered his &ldquo;republic&rdquo; as a small sized city state, so the object of his patriotism could be pure and abstract fatherland, ignoring the traditional framework of property system (societas civilis). To the contrary, Kant struggled to form his state theory as a middle-sized territorial state, which aimed to destroy traditional and privileged property system and to separate territorial sovereignty from economical private land property rights. Therefore Kant's concepts of &ldquo;Land&rdquo; and &ldquo;Volk&rdquo; played an important role to build a theory of modern and republican territorial states. This indicates that it was logically natural for Kant to deny the concepts of the world republic.

DOI： 10.11205/jalp1953.2005.156

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Chuo University  

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Fukushima National College of Technology  

Die Arbeit behandlt jenes Buch "Paradise and Power", das von Robert Kagan beschreibt wurde, in Bezug auf die Beziehung zwischen Gewalt und Recht. Nach Kagan entspricht der Gegensatz zwichen Unilateralismus von USA und heutige EU dem Gegensatz zwischen hobbesischen Weltordnungsanschauung und kantische Weltdnungsanschauung, d.h. zwischen Gewalt und (Volker) Recht. Aber auch die USA entwickelt sich als unabhangiger, souveraner und nationaler Staat in der internationale Ordnung. Theoretsisch gesagt, Gewalt und Recht wirken gegenseitig. Entweder Gewalt oder Recht kann den Vorrang vor andere haben. Die beide unterstutzt miteinander.

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Fukushima National College of Technology  

Der vorliegende Aufsatz behandelt den "Vorbehalt des Gesetzes (VG)" im bereich offentlicher Rechtslehre nach dem 2. Weltkrieg. Nach dem 2. Weltkrieg in Japan ist VG zweideutig verstanden. Einerseits ist VG als Eingriff in die Menschenrechte betrachtet, deshalb ist das im Bereich der Verfassungsrechtslehre verboten. Anderseits ist VG im Bereich der Verwaltungsrechtslehre als Voraussetzung der "Gesetzmassigkeit der Verwaltung" anerkannt. Die Urasche dieses Widerspruch stammt davon, dass der heutige moderne Verfassungsstaat zwei verschiedene Staatsidee enthalt. Namlich erfordert moderne Sozialstaatsidee zahlreiche Eingriffe in die Freiheit. Und es darf nur auf Grund eines Gesetzes (d. h. VG) erlaubt werden. Aber die neugeborene japanische Verfassungsrechtslehre und Naturrechtsstaatsidee, die nach der Erlebnis Totalismus wieder eingeschatzt wurde, kritisiert Eingriff in die Freiheit. Diese Arbeit erortert die Entsprechung von zweideutigen VG und zwei Staatsidee modemer Konstitutionalismus. Und es lasst sich erklaren, dass dieser Widerspruch in der japanischen offentlichen Rechtslehre vom unklaren Gesetzesbegriff stammt.

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Chuo University  

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Chuo University  

CiNii Books

researchmap